Africa: Understanding hidden lifeline of groundwater recharge

Reliable estimates of groundwater recharge are essential to ensure that abstraction remains sustainable and that Africa avoids the pitfalls experienced in other regions where overexploitation has led to falling water tables, deteriorating water quality, and reduced long-term resilience

Groundwater recharge, the process by which rainfall infiltrates the ground and replenishes underground aquifers, is fundamental to water security. Across Africa, it is the backbone of drinking-water provision and is increasingly being sourced and developed for irrigation and piped urban supply. 

However, quantifying groundwater recharge is not straightforward. A study into mapping groundwater recharge in Africa from ground observations and implications for water security, found that recharge is highly variable across time and space, especially in Africa’s diverse climates.

It is often episodic in drylands, where years can pass without measurable replenishment before a rare, intense rainfall event delivers significant recharge. Yet despite these complexities, accurate estimates are indispensable for guiding governance, policy, and investment decisions.

Without them, Africa risks either underutilising the resource or, worse, repeating the unsustainable trajectories seen in aquifers such as the US High Plains or India’s Indo-Gangetic Basin.

Recharge rates across Africa’s climates

The study’s authors provide a comprehensive assessment of groundwater recharge across Africa, offering insights that span five decades (1970 to 2019).

The research compiled data from 134 groundbased studies and mapped distributed long-term average (LTA) recharge volumes.

This multi-decadal approach reflects the reality that, particularly in semi-arid and arid regions, annual recharge figures can be misleading. Noting that Africa has aquifers containing vast reserves of fossil groundwater, accumulated thousands of years ago under wetter climates, the analysis confirmed that measurable modern recharge does occur across most of Africa.

Patterns of recharge varied strongly with climate. In hyper-arid zones, recharge was rare but not absent and typically associated with episodic rainfall events that infiltrated through wadies (valleys or riverbeds that contain water only when heavy rain occurs).

In arid zones, median decadal recharge was about 60mm, while semi-arid areas recorded median values of 200mm. In both cases, recharge was episodic, occurring only in some years but accumulating significantly over decades. By contrast, in dry sub-humid regions, median decadal recharge was about 920mm, with recharge occurring in most years. In humid areas, values were higher still, at around 1,300mm.

These figures confirm the strong relationship between rainfall and recharge, while also highlighting the role of episodicity in shaping long-term patterns.

At a finer scale, the study identified spatial dependence in recharge over distances up to 900km. This finding suggests that while rainfall is the dominant driver at the continental scale, local soil conditions, land use, and aquifer properties strongly mediate how rainfall translates into recharge, leading to considerable variability that rainfall alone does not capture. 

Recharge, storage and water security  

The interplay between recharge and storage is central to understanding water security in Africa.

The study revealed stark contrasts between different regions and countries, with important implications for management. In North Africa, for example, countries such as Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Tunisia, and Niger have some of the lowest modern recharge rates on the continent, often below 50mm per decade.

Yet these same countries sit above enormous sedimentary aquifers containing vast reserves of fossil groundwater. This combination provides a buffer against short-term climate variability, but it also carries long-term risks.

Once fossil groundwater is abstracted, it does not replenish at a meaningful rate. Without careful management, overexploitation could lead to irreversible declines, mirroring challenges faced in aquifers such as the Ogallala in the US High Plains.

In tropical Africa, by contrast, the dominant aquifer type is weathered crystalline rock, which generally has modest storage but is sustained by high, regular recharge.

Countries such as Liberia, Equatorial Guinea, Guinea, Côte d’Ivoire, and Burundi fall into this category. Their water supplies are relatively secure in the long term, as aquifers replenish yearly.

Still, they remain vulnerable to short-term droughts, especially where abstraction levels are high. Some countries are fortunate to enjoy both high storage and high recharge, including Guinea-Bissau, the Republic of Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Nigeria, and Angola.

These nations benefit from a level of water security that is rare across the continent. Conversely, others face the double challenge of both low storage and low recharge. Countries such as eSwatini, Zambia, Lesotho, Zimbabwe, South Africa, and Eritrea fall into this category, where water security is inherently fragile. 

Implications for groundwater management

The findings from this study highlight the need for a more nuanced understanding of water security.

Traditional assessments often focus narrowly on renewable (evaporation, condensation, precipitation, infiltration, percolation, transpiration, and runoff) water availability, expressed as annual ratios between supply and demand. Such approaches risk overlooking the importance of storage and the episodic nature of recharge.

The authors posit that a more comprehensive framework, incorporating both storage and recharge, offers a clearer picture of sustainability and resilience.

For countries reliant on fossil groundwater, such as those in North Africa, the key challenge is to balance current needs with long-term sustainability.

Drawing down large aquifers can provide security in the present, but unchecked abstraction risks the kinds of depletion and environmental degradation already seen elsewhere.

For countries with high recharge but low storage, the challenge is different: managing abstraction levels during droughts to avoid temporary crises, while recognising that the long-term risk of irreversible depletion is lower.

These distinctions underline the importance of adaptive, locally tailored groundwater management. Dedicated local monitoring networks, including measurements of groundwater levels, abstraction rates, and water quality, are essential.

While data such as that from the NASA/DLR-operated Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission can give valuable insights at large scales, they cannot substitute for in-situ monitoring, which is vital for early warning and responsive management. 

Knowledge gaps and research needs  

The study notes that 19 African countries still lack reliable ground-based recharge studies. This is particularly true in the humid regions of Central and West Africa, as well as Madagascar, where high rainfall may have led to assumptions that groundwater is a less critical factor.

Yet without data, these assumptions remain untested, and weaken the ability to model continental and global hydrological processes. The Horn of Africa also stands out as a region with insufficient data, despite its heavy reliance on groundwater for drought resilience.

This lack of information hampers effective planning and management in an area where climate variability is a pressing challenge.

Future research must therefore focus on filling these gaps. Long-term monitoring programmes, employing integrative methods such as chloride mass balance (CMB), water-table fluctuation (WTF), environmental tracers (EnTs), water balance (WB) calculations, and multi-decadal hydrographs, are critical to achieving a complete picture of recharge dynamics. ESI

Cover photo:  rutchapong©123rf.com